<unnamed>

Public Key

npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq

Profile Code

nprofile1qqst0nulg2nedvy3appae6ge60h5crwg9cpfg5hd7z7meh4eajunu7qpzemhxue69uhkzarvv9ejumn0wd68ytnvv9hxgqg4waehxw309ajkgetw9ehx7um5wghxcctwvsfr26ry

Publishing to

Last Notes

2026-09-22 15:45:25 UTC

- reply

You say it. Nostr shows, that borders can be drawn on a personal level. No overlord needed, to guard us.

2026-09-22 15:41:59 UTC

What a great catch. Staying on top of feelings can be dificult. But when it comes to hate and the urge for violence, staying on top of the feelings is what is needed. No matter how hard it seems.
#nevent1q…8pwk

2026-09-19 11:38:38 UTC

- reply

What?
Why would someone not behrecognized as an individual for putting themself into an echochamber?
Obviously this happens. There are many people, which loose the access of evaluating evidence in a new way.
People that simply restrict themself of all evidence, which undermines their perspective. This is a real thing. And it is what people usually mean, when they talk about echochambers.
Opinionreflectors. Individuals, which fear diverging perspectives. There are even some going that far to discredit a huge amount of journalism, only for their self constructed perspective to not crumble.

2026-09-19 11:33:09 UTC

- reply

Ok. Thanks.

2026-09-19 10:29:31 UTC

- reply

What does this mean?

2026-09-19 10:28:46 UTC

- reply

Maby they do exist. But not technology is creating them. People decide to enchamber themselfs in it.

2026-09-19 05:16:46 UTC

- reply

Agree with you. What drives people to such measures. Does he think he will be a wise person for following this?

2026-09-18 20:52:33 UTC

- reply

Who would write such a phrase and then put quiet unrelated pictures with it? There are very clear uncontroversial representatives for information control. But those shown are nowhere close to those I am talking about.

2026-09-18 20:44:38 UTC

- reply

I think I just deleted the internet.

2026-09-18 14:51:09 UTC

When this is exactly what it is written to be, this is all I have been looking for in Nostr during the last years.
A ordered forum is such an important thing 🥳
#nevent1q…tmct

2026-09-18 13:04:28 UTC

- reply

And what is the problem with being skinny?

2026-09-18 13:03:22 UTC

- reply

Really great. This is one of the little popular private messengers, I did know for a while, but never tried it myself.
Maby I will test it out soon. But I really think, that the connected phone number is a big plus for signal, when it comes to finding contacts.
And in the end, most people want to use one chat app in an ideal case. Some are open to install a second one. But little are happy to operate several.
And therefore I can see, that there can hardly be more than 3 popular chat apps. So when privacy should be a thing, I am happy to use Signal, since many friends and family members already adapted it.
And the hardest part is still convincing people to accept conversations outside Whatsapp. Since in whatsapp there is a hand full of people, one can not reach. In Signal it often is a hand full of people one can reach. With more private solutions often this numer gets smaller down to absolute nerds like us. Or onelneeds to offer direct technical support. And not many people are even happy to get this support from me.

2026-09-18 11:55:37 UTC

- reply

Ok. Nice to know. I think the last time I checked, this was nit yet available 🫣✌️

2026-09-18 11:10:08 UTC

- reply

In what world are you living, to call a donation based non-profit foundation a "Coorperation"?
Or do you mean the dependencies?

2026-09-18 11:08:58 UTC

- reply

I can also write a note in notepad++ without registring my phone number.
Can you call people via Delta-chat? Can you have private videocalls?

2026-09-18 11:06:35 UTC

- reply

It is simply a small step forward. Eventually, they can offer different payment options. But one has to start somewhere.

2026-09-18 11:05:28 UTC

- reply

Definitly a good donation. Different projects to a more privacy centric world are increasing eachothers usecase.
Signal offers a messenger, that is very easy to opt for and offers very good privacy. It still has some shortcomings. But also offered technical clientside solutions to the privacy community, which became a de facto standard.

2026-09-18 11:02:19 UTC

- reply

A nice little step. But first they would need to accept private payments in one or the other way, so it would actually be a privacy improvement.

2026-09-16 20:31:40 UTC

- reply

I started mabe around 5 years ago with Jack recyders "Darknet Diaries" and got to learn Jordan harbinger through that one.
Bot good podcast. First for all hacking, crime and internet related stuff. Second a bit of everything. Jordan just reads a lot and speaks with authors most of the time.
In german I really love "Philosophy to go."
Two brothers explaining a lot of philosophers in easy to understand language.
nd two newspapers, I listen to the AI-read articles often. Republik.ch and Krautreport.de
And sometimes truecrime podcast from germany called "Zeit Verbrechen"

2026-09-15 05:32:16 UTC

- reply

Sad story to read in the morning 🥲

2026-09-14 18:47:54 UTC

- reply

But even the closed models can write FOSS software. And often the good models are better in architecture then most human too.
So I would not really sit with you on that one.
In the end they create and publish tools we can use. And when they are published with sourcecode and run locally. Isn’t this the whole deal about free and opensource?
I mean no living soul could actually verify all code that runs on their computer not even before AI.

2026-09-14 18:41:31 UTC

- reply

You mean just outside Signal? So stuff you freely decide to use?

2026-09-14 18:34:16 UTC

- reply

I don’t know. I assume so. But I do not drive a car regularly. So not the right person to ask.

2026-09-14 18:32:35 UTC

- reply

I would say so. It does not have realtime data to get around trafficjams.
But it has a huge amount of details. You look for the closest fountain, you’ll find it, for the next ATM, is also there.
Its basically a Wikipedia of location data.

2026-09-14 18:29:39 UTC

- reply

I already got used to OrganicMaps offline routing.

2026-09-14 16:32:07 UTC

- reply

Thanks

2026-09-14 15:54:00 UTC

- reply

I am totally open to change my assumption. But the time is still to come, where you share your first evidence to back any of your claims.
Not a single claim of yours is backed by evidence you brought forward.
Absolute nonsense, what you do.

2026-09-14 15:44:02 UTC

- reply

Stop behaving as if you would be a great genious medical scientist. You grant around on such a small issue, while the data of the efficacy of the vaccine are drowning every doubt with massive evidence.
How do you explain the all cause mortality difference of 25%?
How do you explain the severe COVID effects with 75% less deadly effects on vaccined?
Those numbers rely not even a dime on this 2 weeks. But you desperatly want to belief, that the vaccines were not working or even decreasing humans health, while there is all the evidence for the contrary.
Stop behaving like a clown. Really.

2026-09-14 15:22:45 UTC

- reply

You completly overstate those two weeks. Lets take the study of a number of people over a time of 4 years.
These two weaks get the potential to change the results for 1%. This is the biggest change you can expect.
It does not flip these studies on its head. And as I wrote before. It would be false to account those two weeks as fully vaccinated.
Or what part do youlnot understand of that vaccines need time to have their full effect on the immune system? This time span are the two weeks.

2026-09-14 15:17:16 UTC

- reply

Probably yes 🙌
Those who were not killed by the overreaching surveillance regimes, that are growing now.

2026-09-14 15:16:16 UTC

Totally agree
I would definitly say, that the panic is something that has happened very often. I think it is just that the rate of change is not comforting most people. And therefore they panick.
When there are coming generations, I think they will be fine with this.
I am too. I mean, when a change is unstoppable, we need to go forward and accept it.
I always think of this phrase: "Accept the things I can not change and invest my energy and time in the things I can change."
#nevent1q…822u

2026-09-14 15:03:10 UTC

- reply

What is falsifiable in: "probably there are cases, where vaccine sideeffects were accounted to the effects for the lack of them..."?
Every medicine has some time to take effect. With coffein you have around 20-40 minutes until the effect is in full activity.
So it is reasonable to account people that only just got vaccinated still as unvaccinated. Since their immune system did not yet get the time to react fully on the jab.
But this will make a very small change in evidence. When a pandemic was here around 3 years, I would not give a damn about two weeks.
And yes. Today it is more clear than ever, that vaccines like Phizer, Modena and those used in the west had by far lower sideeffects, than the infection has had effects on the body.
Sources to back this:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38388239/#:~:text=Using%20a%20modified,in%20the%20US.
Shows mortality of people with or without vaccine. An estremely strong 25% lower all cause morality for vaccined compared to unvaccined people.
Also 74% less people died from severe COVID effects, when they were jabbed.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/403095155_JAMA_Network_Open-The_Year_in_Review_2025#:~:text=COVID%2D19%20mRNA%20Vaccination,severe%20COVID%2D19%20death
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9467278/#:~:text=Front%20Cardiovasc%20Med,meta%2Danalysis%20%5BNavya%20Voleti%5D(https%3A%2F%2Fpubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov%2F%3Fterm%3D%25
The most sever sideeffect of vaccines (Myocarditis) occured 7 times more often in infected people than in people that had the vaccine. So yes this was may still a sideeffect. But COVID caused it also simply in a much higher number of people.

2026-09-14 13:13:57 UTC

- reply

No this is not my point. My point is that scientific discussion happens through papers. The scientific reputation, through falsification, analysis of the methods applied and the number of citations define, what value a paper has.
A podcast is no professional board of scientific discussion. Share the paper of this doctor. Then we can examine, what critics say about it.
My critique is actually towards you, to keep a line of argumentation without bringing evidence, where we both can check on it.
You try to stay vague, so your claims can not be falsified. But only something that can be falsified can be of value even.

2026-09-14 04:15:53 UTC

- reply

So you actually base your oppinion on somebody saying this and that on a podcast?
I hope you realize how rediculous this sounds?
A podcast is by no means any sirious source, where one can get good feedback if this stuff has any backing in facts or is merely some gut feeling by someone. It is not a platform of scientific discussion neighter.
No sirious scientist publishes their big breakthrough (what a rewrite of such a narrative would be) in a podcast. When this is backed by anything, there is a poper for it and then there ic critique for this paper.
Before studying the paper or at leaxt the critique, I really do not understand, why you blindly trust some dude that gets invited into a podcast.
You really just seem to have a very random share of trust. To some sources you trust simply by the fact that somebody interviewed them and others you do not trust, even when there is papers backing a position.
I think at this point it is hard to give you any credibility at all. Some critical thinking basics you have to understand in order to be of any help in a scientific discussion.

2026-09-14 04:05:49 UTC

- reply

Seems like the design of Amethyst. Beautiful and with a lot of options. But please take this as no offense. I think Nostr needs this super app, where one can explore all the features of nostr.
Other apps should then focus to be more minimal.

2026-09-13 15:34:26 UTC

- reply

Yes. I think in the last decade many people got more cornered in their circle of thoughts. And the freedom to listen to stuff one probably does not agree with got smaller.
I think it has a lot to do with doomscrolling and overconsuming, which brings many people into a stress situation. They only react in a type of "fight or flight" mode.
Most of the time it is not important, that we decide fast (fight or flight), but rather that we can find good decisions.
I feel you.

2026-09-13 12:11:38 UTC

- reply

Often I tested such keybinding tools as vim. But always ran back to GUI-based, since I often did not see the bigger picture.
But maby my tasks are also not so much in coding. So I simply do not profit from these tools in the same way fulltime coders would.

2026-09-13 12:06:20 UTC

- reply

Always in the offense. Good energy 🙌

2026-09-13 12:04:48 UTC

I think we are on the way to get bigger then that chamber. Or at least my filters are adjusted, that it feels more and more like it.
#nevent1q…6mgw

2026-09-13 12:02:27 UTC

- reply

Great to hear. In the end it is far more important, what common ground people share, than where we diverge.
Since for differences mostly ignorance is the needed action. And for common ideas, cooperation is what speeds up our utopia coming true. 🙌

2026-09-13 11:59:58 UTC

Definitly. Hopefully Nostr can grow to a meaningful exchange of thoughts, where everyone is welcome.
Great to see people that know Nostr is bigger than the sum of all nostriches.
#nevent1q…eehj

2026-09-13 10:53:01 UTC

- reply

Thanks for this video. I actually learned something. Reduce mental load.

2026-09-13 10:32:08 UTC

- reply

Does not matter. hen a software is free to use, copy, analyse and modify, the thoughts of the developers do not matter as much.
You can use it as you like. And when someone doesn’t like to use a software, let them 😉

2026-09-13 08:49:27 UTC

- reply

Good news if it is true.
Hopefully these new listeners do not simply like the surveillance they hear 🥲🫣

2026-09-13 08:46:50 UTC

- reply

Definitly they have things to solve.
One is to keep their independence, the other is internal corruption. But corruption is usually not a short term effort.
It needs a change of culture.

2026-09-13 08:44:53 UTC

- reply

Should rather stand for internet and propaganda driven info-channels.
These is still a lot of very good jounalism. It can be found everywhere. Not only in print, not only in the internet.
But the hard part is to figure out what can be trusted sources. And every individual needs to make this decision for themself.

2026-09-13 08:38:55 UTC

- reply

I think Debian and Arch have contrary goals. Debian wants stability. Therefore new changes of packages are tested well, before they go in the stable release. So with debian you get stability.
Arch on the other side just updates every time a maintainer changes a bit of his project. So you get always the newest features the first. But then usually as arch user you are also a alpha or beta tester.
Just different goals. Both distros offer a very good community driven distro. Both base in FOSS packages.

2026-09-13 08:34:11 UTC

- reply

Yes. But I would argue, that most bad goals are not rational.
But clearly one can always give rational explanations on how to achiev a goal and they are no good at all.

2026-09-12 20:59:43 UTC

- reply

I rather would say, that human rights are the corner stone of humanity.
Execution is outside it already.

2026-09-12 18:49:43 UTC

What a title 😂
#nevent1q…s9y5

2026-09-12 16:24:40 UTC

- reply

Thank you for your detailed review. Such an intresting perspective.

2026-09-12 16:11:43 UTC

https://blossom.primal.net/5566fa53c9dad2b917aa49fb7e7cebafc87556a520686a37eb7b8eecd6855e67.jpg https://blossom.primal.net/61aaffa874fe5a4958c5276dfe739d14c7ee1cfc3f7edc7cb1e9aca293153c93.jpg
So rare #amethyst just says that I follow this handle. And it shows me the notes in my feed.
@nprofile…vhl6 can you somehow know how this happens?

2026-09-12 16:08:16 UTC

- reply

Could be me. You are the only shitposter I follow, since your posts sometimes are actually funny 🙌🥳

2026-09-12 16:03:16 UTC

- reply

Omarchy is a new (very opinionated) arch-based Linux distro.
The goal of DHH (who created Omarchy) is to build a distro, that is very fast to install, offers all the tools DHH uses and looks nice.
It is explicitly not the goal to make it similar to Windows or Mac. The goal is not an easy opt in for new users. The goal is to offer a new way of computing to those who are willing to learn it.
Networkchuck has a good conversation with DHH, where he explains the intentions:
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=_CuibYl_Fh0

2026-09-12 15:48:25 UTC

Thanks for this. So important to see this difference. Political discourse is just a tool. People can misuse it to push their own good. But the tool of political duscussion has no inherent problems.
#nevent1q…jpww

2026-09-12 15:44:53 UTC

- reply

I accept these terms and conditions

2026-09-12 15:43:17 UTC

Hopefully there is a way to end this madness of Putin. Hard to say, if it can even be an option by the big propaganda Putin throws at russians.
#nevent1q…0vy7

2026-09-12 15:40:18 UTC

- reply

Hopefully more people start using Zapstore 🫣
(and AOSP based roms, since Stock Android will stop the install of secondary stores 🫣🫣🫣)

2026-09-12 15:13:57 UTC

- reply

Not really for anyone. Only for the owners of the relays I connect to. And the amount of data collected is minimal.
It will be hard to connect nostr user handles to real people, when they use a VPN and do not directly share the personal data in public.

2026-09-12 15:09:59 UTC

- reply

And I hope you have the ability to pardon me for liking a comment, where context is given. I still like the comment. It is context. And everyone can do with it what he/she wants.
I think for an opensource project it is nothing that makes me not use it for knowing this context. But it is maby a reason to look at the mentioned com unities with apathy.

2026-09-12 15:06:44 UTC

- reply

#nevent1q…le3d
I think it is no problem to use a good solution. Even when it is developed by a racist or whatever imoral person.
And I spend no time trying to not be racist. For me it comes naturally to look at people as simple humans with whatever different changable and non-changable characteristics.
But I also stated in this mentioned comment, that my firsturection to this post was might a bit far from my values.
I think that we all have quiet independent capabilities.

2026-09-12 10:41:57 UTC

- reply

And when you think so, why would you use it?

2026-09-12 09:59:01 UTC

- reply

And did you already get used to the tiling window manager?

2026-09-12 09:58:27 UTC

- reply

What do you think is the economic powerhouse #USA built on?

2026-09-12 09:56:56 UTC

- reply

Why?

2026-09-12 09:09:00 UTC

Hopefully more people chase quality of life for the decades to come.
#nevent1q…h58c

2026-09-12 09:05:46 UTC

- reply

I just reacted to this. Then I checked out some conversations on youtube about omarchy, checked the doctrine and the link you shared.
And I think in the end it seems to me, that socially not so capable people can be damn genius in building good technical solutions.
These are diferent dimensions.
And I want to look at Omarchy for the goals it stands for. In the end apple does not base its popularity for social traits of the CEO. It is an opinionated predefined system, that offers productivity through making most decisions for the user.
Fritz Haber also foun a way to produce ammonia in a synthetic way, which results in a agricultural revolution and the end of a lot of hunger in the world. And he was called the father of chemical warfare. He created them for the german military in the first worldwar.
In my view, the process on how to cynthesize is still great. Not matter what his opinions and works are besides it.
And the same way Omarchy can be great, while its owner is not to be idealized in other traits. And I think this is also what the freedom in Linux stands for. A war criminal can participate in Linux. And humanrights activists can participate. In linux it is about how well a techvical solution works. Nothing else.
But clearly maby there are communities, where one would not like to participate in.

2026-09-12 06:54:41 UTC

- reply

Do you actually belief this?
I think Nostr offers the privacy so everyone can express what they see as important.
This offers the opportunity for everyone to filter this protocol, to interact, where they see good vibes.
And it offers the opportunity to call out bad behavior as well.

2026-09-12 06:50:43 UTC

Thank you very much for sharing this. A distro that is centered so much around one person, puts much pressure to the ideas this person shares.
Maby I am not fine to try the technical compilations of a racist.
#nevent1q…jzzw

2026-09-12 06:43:32 UTC

Defnitly feel the Nostr vibes in this omarchy doctrine. I want to test it as well.
#nevent1q…aynt

2026-09-12 00:25:33 UTC

- reply

No one can sey he forgot it.

2026-09-11 12:54:43 UTC

Insanly great I would say :D
#nevent1q…hzk3

2026-09-11 12:53:29 UTC

Echt tragisch. Ich denke es ist wohl klar, wo das geld so hinwandert...?
Das ist ja bloss das Resultat von wachsender ungleichheit. Sowohl Unternehmen, wie auch angestellte gehen zeitgleich in Insolvenz. Wo die Mittelklasse und armen sich weniger leisten können, da gibt es auch weniger Dienstleistungen, welche nachgefragt werden können.
#nevent1q…hd56

2026-09-11 11:50:46 UTC

The video attached in the mentioned note offers very good explanations, how democracy can be understood. And that most probably democracy is not about getting governance done correctly. But to get an opportunity to get it right. And to get an opportunity to correct imperfections.
This is why I want democracy. I accept the imperfections of me. I accept the imperfections of you and the others. And therefore open discussions are important. In free software we get a great glimpse of an idea, how this could look like. Through cooperation, competition and acceptance.
Through building something alone, participate in a project with others or sometimes leaving a project for a more progressive direction, or a more conservative one.
#nevent1q…u5av

2026-09-11 10:55:40 UTC

- reply

Thanks for the tip. I was always thinking to get a good hardware wallet. But always would want to purchase generic hardware and load the software myself.
This seems a very good setup 🙌

2026-09-11 09:43:31 UTC

Our economy will produce whatever the people with means to pay request.
So lets take advantage of this mechanics. Why request some hardware brick, where most of the control over it belongs to a company still? We can just buy a Pixel phone and load #GrapheneOS or even buy a #Fairphone and load #murena s /e/-OS or plain Linux.
We can buy hardware, where software can be owned. Why pay money one worked for, to rent hardware you will never own? Same counts for TV, cars, toothbrush, freezer or whatever.
I really have no problem to ditch some minor comfort of most edge tech, when I can own my live in response.
So maby my fridge does not do my groceries. Maby my phone can nur run every banking app.
But maby this is, because I simply do not let myself manipulate in every misery someone would like to have me in. Maby I really like to stay in control. What is your preference? #asknostr

2026-09-11 09:32:05 UTC

Such a strong post about the means of #privacy
#nevent1q…frt8

2026-09-11 05:04:49 UTC

- reply

Intresting theory.
So you would assume, when an illness comes up, that causes a certain set of symptoms.
Then these same symptoms are found in other places on earth within weeks. And in both places there was no preexisting known illness with those symptoms.
Do you want to tell me now, that those two infections are not connected? That a connection between those two events would be fabricated?

2026-09-11 04:54:10 UTC

- reply

This is your decision. I respect this.
Noone pushes you to have this conversation with me.
But when you decide for yourself to simply belief a source because it the conclusion it comes to comforts you, then you have to accept, that you are not looking for truth.
You look for confirmation.

2026-09-11 03:57:27 UTC

- reply

Thank you very much for your help. I will apply this project. Seems a great effort in my eyes.

2026-09-10 19:23:04 UTC

And I really need to smile often, when I read the word narrative in your notes. Do you belief the world consists only of narratives and incentives?
I am sure these two parts maby form a final outcome a bit. But under the hood there is always hard facts, that form 90% of the world.
Even when my imployer has the incentive for me to produce 10 times more every day. There is hard facts, that stop me from acchieving this.
And those hard facts are everywhere. Be it in biology, be it in psychology. Be it in Physics. Be it in politics. Maby there are fields, where it is far harder to find these hard facts. But only because noone can figure them out does not mean, that they are inexistant.
And I am most intrested in these hard facts. Incentives and narratives are a cheap mascarade.

2026-09-10 18:50:01 UTC

- reply

> I did say "likely" (not definitively) but the importance of the statement was the second part.
I think it is far from accurate to call it likely. Offer evidence we can both look at, where it shows that it is likely to be correlated. Otherwise at least admit, that this point of yours was probably unwise.
And when you put a list of statements, you can not claim the overall statement to hold true, when I can disproof one.
Every statement of a note needs to hold true, for a not to be true. This is simple logic. Nothing I invented.
And the logic of falsifying statements does not depend on incentives. A hypothesis can be falsified, no matter what incentives are. And even when someone had all incentives to disqualify the correlation of vaccines and cancer.
One good paper, that flawlessly offers evidence, that the causality is probable offers a foundation. But this single paper does not yet exist.
And you mentioning authism shows, that you really like cherrypicking conspiracy theiries, that were falsified strongly.
A hypothesis that is falsified could only become true, whev the falsifications are proofen methological issues and a study without methological flaws proofing the hypothesis true.
But this is not existant.

2026-09-10 18:37:15 UTC

- reply

I would also say, that an argument being extreme does not devalue the argument. But neighter does it increase the value.
I think your point has very weak backing. And it is extreme for me, to defend an argument, that has little backing and the small backing that it has can be falsified by amateurs.
And to me it seems a wrong to propagate ideas, where oneself actually understands, that it is wrong. Since this is manipulative activity against people, that do not take the time to research it well or for people, that cimply lack the practice of critical thinking.
For me it is hard to say, if you are a victim of such fraud or maby even a person that participates in such fraud.
But I am quiet hopeful, you are really willing to figure out the true facts. So maby start accepting, that all your mentioned positions had never had working arguments to disproof them. They were simply disqualified for cultural preferences, preferences of power or stupidity.
This is clearly different, when it comes to the hypothesis, that covid vaccines cause cancer.

2026-09-10 17:02:45 UTC

- reply

Probably the person calling something extreme.Funny question easy answer.

2026-09-10 17:02:06 UTC

- reply

> It matters because the rise in cancers in working age people is likely linked to the vaccines
This statement I find an extreme position. And it is highly speculative. I can also state, that listening to a certain song for 2 times a day for 7 years will lead to the strength to lift 200 kilos over the head. Only because I would be able to publish real cases, where this happened does still not proof the causality of the cong to the strength.
And say that scientists do not investigate it for clear reasons against me.
And this is more or less the reasoning with vaccines causing cancer. The only difference, that clearly many institutions would want to know it, when there is evidence, which points in this direction.
But the studies pointing in this direction (1. Kim et al. 2025, Seoul; 2. Gentilini 2026; 3. Kuperwasser 2026) have critial errors in methology.
1. Did not control for COVID-19 infections.
2. Explicitly states, it can not establish causality between vaccines and cancer.
3. States, that the current data is insufficient to support a causality of cancer being caused by COVIC-vaccines.
So give me any study, that is not disqualified for obvious reasons and holds evidence for the causality between vaccines and cancer.
Otherwise I see it as an extreme statement. And I decide for myself to see it as an extreme statement.

2026-09-10 15:48:58 UTC

- reply

Do you at least agree, that extreme situations, like earthquakes (as in Venezuela or Colombia recently), floods (as in Nepal) or Zunamis like the one in Fukushima cause a huge destruction. So the loss of value is inherently created naturally.
We live in a world, where it is normal, that nature destroys stuff, takes live and makes total worldwide wealth shrink.
Just the same way illnesses are very powerful natural desasters, which can lower health of thousands of people and in extreme cases kill us.
When such a natural disaster takes place, what is the first priority?
Is it to help fast and focus on the people, where lives can be saved? Is the main concern to negociate best prices? I assume you know the mechanics of markets? When demand spikes and production didlnot have yet time to adapt to the demand, high prices are a natural result. The most expected result.
You state quiet a lot of extreme positions. You state interventions (as isolation and keeping distance) as propaganda.
When you call it propaganda, do you assume, that viruses can spread equally fast independent of how many people meet eachother, how close they are to eachother or if they use protection like masks?
Since these interventions stand on very strong logic explanations, that one can even explain to children. No doctor title needed to understand their efficiancy in lowering infectionrate.
Could you might propose some alternative behavior, you would applaud people? The behavior you would have really liked to see?

2026-09-10 12:06:54 UTC

- reply

Can I ask a simple question?
What is it that makes you think all the tematics around the covid vaccines is of high importance?
In what do you feel treated unfair? And what do you need from the people around you, so you can shake hands and talk about other stuff?
Since as I know COVID is not pandemy anymore. The virus is still in existance. But today it is a more controled virus, since many people have some tolerance againstit.

2026-09-06 00:47:03 UTC

- reply

No I would not see it as unconventional.
And I rate monogamy a form of romantic relation. Not a sexual preference or practise.
But definitly the exclusivity offers so much value. I would never want to miss this idea of security I can give to my wife.
And with all the ceductions we have in our world, exclusivity is definitly not a majority.
Depends also if one talks of exclusivity based on the future, based on the now or based on all time of my life. There is different understandings of monogamy. Or other aspects that are beautiful to give as well.

2026-09-01 18:50:51 UTC

Very strong arguments to get the wealthiest taxed for their wealth. Since the wealth is finite, how it is distributed matters.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2NibPdbxOz0

2026-09-01 03:31:15 UTC

- reply

In what world do you life?

2026-08-31 16:53:58 UTC

- reply

Just went into a Spar to buy a chees for a snack with my Bitcoin. Only thanks to this note 🙌

2026-08-31 14:39:03 UTC

- reply

Brave is named just Brave. And it is free to install and opensource for all Platforms. And with Yandex I always had too much trust issues to bother trying them.
Biggest issue in my opinion is to get away from Edge and Chrome. And I suggest Firefox or Brave to go to. Probably there are others that are fine as well.

2026-08-31 06:04:28 UTC

GM
I just watched the video below and learned something new. Inequality in itself is a problem for poor and middleclass.
I’ll try to recap and explain:
I assume that most readers of this note are familiar, that the richest 1% worldwide got much richer in the last decade, compared to the other 99%.
So when we assume a free market economy, we assume that one dollar equals one vote, on what should be produced more.
So when the richer are able to grow their wealth faster than everyone else, means that they get increasing power to vote, what workers will produce.
So when the ultra rich have got a bigger part, more human work force will be incentivized to publish articles, which please the rich, offer more luxury services and goods. (and build less housing for middleclass, less innovation in food production, less investment for private services like Proton, Nostr or Signal)
Means that our middle class wage has less power to request goods. That the economy works less towards our needs and more towards the needs of super rich.
And to distort the majority population from resolving this problem, super rich people buy trusted media outlets to spread hate and bad feelings against whatever, that is not them. Be it state burocrats, be it immigrants, be it people that do not work, be it disabled people.
I think in a crisis it is important, we are able to precisely figure out, what causes the disaster. So we should find media, that is funded by the middleclass. We should care, who funds the media we consume. Since whoever funds it has the most legitimate voice to decide what is investigated. What articles are getting published.
Since an economy, that only works for the rich is probably most accuratly described as an oligarchy. We the middleclass have the power to defend free societies from these oligarchies. Let’s do it.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=2SD2faiYmjo

2026-08-30 18:34:25 UTC

- reply

#nevent1q…rfge
Do you know to which people this note refers to?

2026-08-30 13:30:32 UTC

What a powerful image you paint here. I am happy to shar this idea.
In order for a currency to be money, people need to use it as medium of exchange. And I rather be a part of it and see it fail, than to expect that others will make it become a medium of exchange.
#nevent1q…g822

2026-08-29 05:46:57 UTC

- reply

Yes would be great.

2026-08-28 20:39:34 UTC

- reply

One can simply stop to update the phone and it will keep working the same way. This is different with a service which is streamed on demand.

2026-08-28 15:33:32 UTC

- reply

Thanks. Very good counter arguments.
I would conclude from it, that collectivism is not inherently bad. But when the collective does bad stuff it is far more catastrophic.
I think most countries that have working socialist states work with a constitution, which rules above all. This makes policing more objective and gives less room to tyranny.

2026-08-28 15:30:02 UTC

- reply

To me it sounds great. I assume that the filter of time will keep working anyways. Only the great stuff will stay for longer.

2026-08-28 15:16:04 UTC

- reply

I totally see, that this is a horrific story. But can somebody explain, why it should be an example to oppose gun control?
When the police officer is a crazy murder, then what would it matter to this crazy dude, if there is gun control or not?