Bitcoiners: In the literal sense...
Would you run a Bitcoin Core patch that disconnects v1 peers and only keeps BIP324 (v2 transport) peers?
It advertises NODE_P2P_V2, drops outbound v1 peers, drops relay peers using v1, and drops peers claiming v2 support while connecting via v1.
I think it's exactly what the network needs to speed BIP324 adoption, but I could be wrong.
MrHodl
npub198…t0p3g
2026-05-31 10:18:24 UTC
Author Public Key
npub198auqkkwueclk4u3st9r8v8yrdz4hv0e2e9epg7c7teemm3lyausht0p3gSeen on
wss://nostr.winePublished at
2026-05-31 10:18:24 UTCEvent JSON
{
"id": "6a59b347d64a257af79b0e24c601685528fe47d2635d2f749c970494c1abcc26",
"pubkey": "29fbc05acee671fb579182ca33b0e41b455bb1f9564b90a3d8f2f39dee3f2779",
"created_at": 1780222704,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"alt",
"A short note: Bitcoiners: In the literal sense...\n\nWould you run..."
],
[
"client",
"Amethyst"
]
],
"content": "Bitcoiners: In the literal sense...\n\nWould you run a Bitcoin Core patch that disconnects v1 peers and only keeps BIP324 (v2 transport) peers?\n\nIt advertises NODE_P2P_V2, drops outbound v1 peers, drops relay peers using v1, and drops peers claiming v2 support while connecting via v1.\n\nI think it's exactly what the network needs to speed BIP324 adoption, but I could be wrong.",
"sig": "0fa72d9b53d4848f0e89714cb8399bbe56c180e35daf7a79e9082faa9b1691f14713128ee897dd7ece0f93efc0f21d2b8d035bf0215ef0071bbd1002fc6e5752"
}